Prominence Technology Limited v Financial Services Authority: FIN/2004/0027
Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery decision of Judge Bishopp and Member Hanson and Member Laing on 13 September 2005.
Read the full decision in .
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION 바카라 사이트” application for approval of named officer to perform all controlled functions 바카라 사이트” named officer considered not to be fit and proper 바카라 사이트” applications rejected 바카라 사이트” sole issue whether named officer fit and proper since if not, threshold conditions 4 and 5 not satisfied 바카라 사이트” named officer바카라 사이트™s antecedent history 바카라 사이트” whether indicative that he is not fit and proper 바카라 사이트” failure to disclose antecedent history 바카라 사이트” whether indicative of lack of candour 바카라 사이트” tribunal not satisfied on evidence that named officer fit and proper 바카라 사이트” Authority바카라 사이트™s decision upheld.