Frances Delaney v The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs [2025] UKUT 00005 (TCC)
Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery decision of Judge Swami Raghavan on 09 January 2025
Read full decision
1. The applicant, Frances Delaney, applies to the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery) (바카라 사이트淯T바카라 사이트�) for permission to appeal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (바카라 사이트淔TT바카라 사이트�) (Tribunal Judge Amanda Brown KC and Tribunal Member Julian Sims released on 11 March 2024 (바카라 사이트渢he FTT Decision바카라 사이트�) and published as Delaney v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 214 (TC) following a hearing which took place on 14-15 November 2023. 2. The FTT subsequently refused Ms Delaney permission to appeal. Ms Delaney then renewed her application to the UT. I refused permission to appeal on the papers in a decision of 27 September 2024 that was sent to the parties. This is my decision following the oral renewal of the application heard on 22 November 2024. Ms Delaney was represented by Mr Roaul Downey, a barrister, but who represented Ms Delaney in his personal capacity as Ms Delaney바카라 사이트檚 partner. HMRC, represented by Mr Charles Asuelimen, litigator, attended but did not make representations. 3. The FTT Decision concerned the applicant바카라 사이트檚 appeal against an HMRC closure notice. This refused her claim for Entrepreneur바카라 사이트檚 relief on capital gains tax charged on the disposal of her nursery school business, on 1 September 2015, to a limited company which she was the sole director and shareholder of. (The Entrepreneur바카라 사이트檚 Relief, if allowed would have charged tax at the lower rate of 10% rather than 28%. HMRC바카라 사이트檚 refusal had the effect of increasing the applicant바카라 사이트檚 tax liability by 拢196,902.) Under the terms of the relevant statutory provisions in the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 (바카라 사이트淭CGA 1992바카라 사이트�) (as amended by Finance Act 2015), eligibility for the relief depended on the contract giving rise to disposal being made before 3 December 2014. The FTT was not satisfied such contract for disposal was made before that date. It accordingly dismissed the appeal.