David Thomas v The Financial Services Authority: FIN/2004/0006
Upper Tribunal Tax and Chancery decision of Judge Brice, Judge Bishopp and Member Parsloe on 22 September 2004.
Read the full decision in .
PERFORMANCE OF REGULATED ACTIVITIES 바카라 사이트“ Respondent바카라 사이트™s refusal to approve performance by Applicant of controlled functions 바카라 사이트“ three preliminary issues 바카라 사이트“ whether Respondent in breach of time limit in section 61(3) 바카라 사이트“ yes 바카라 사이트“ whether that made the warning notice and the decision notice void 바카라 사이트“ no - whether the fact that the Respondent has appointed investigators in respect of the Applicant are grounds sufficient in themselves for a conclusion that the Applicant is not a fit and proper person 바카라 사이트“ no 바카라 사이트“ reference not yet determined - Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 ss 61, 133 and 168.