CCPG40100 - Non International Trade officers operational process: warning letter: action to take once you have arrived at a decision
Once you have considered whether a warning letter is appropriate, following the guidance at CCPG26200 - CCPG26290, and arrived at a decision, your next action is set out in the table below. It shows the situations that are possible when the compliance officer has completed the CPAC, obtained their manager바카라 사이트™s recommendation and considered a civil penalty Warning Letter (CPWL).
| Compliance officer (CO) decision | Authorising officer (CPO) |
|---|---|
| CPWL not appropriate\nThis may be because:\nthere is a reasonable excuse or\neducation is more appropriate or\nthey are recommending changes/revocation of authorisation, or\nletter of written instruction is more appropriate | CO sends CPAC and any supporting documents to PN301 Team who will allocate the case to a CPO to authorise the decision.\nIf CPO agrees CPWL is not appropriate, they will tell CO. A letter of written instruction may be issued.\nIf CPO decides that a CPWL is appropriate, they will explain why on CPAC, liaise with a CCM if appropriate and then return the case to CO to draft a CPWL and take action below. |
| CPWL is appropriate | CO drafts CPWL.\nCO sends draft CPWL and CPAC to PN301 Team with any supporting documents. Case is referred to a CPO.\nIf the CPO agrees with the issue of the CPWL, they will seek approval from CCM where appropriate. They will add a CPWL ref. & return the CPWL to CO who will issue to trader and copy it to the relevant teams.\nIf CPO thinks a CPWL is not appropriate, they will discuss further actions with CO. |
This information is presented in a different way in the flowchart at CCPG40200.