CH190666 - Publishing details of deliberate tax defaulters: The publication questions: Question 2 - Does this relevant penalty relate to a PDDD period: What is a PDDD period - example
We can only publish a person바카라 사이트™s details if we can answer 바카라 사이트˜yes바카라 사이트™ to all five publication questions at CH190620.
A compliance check into Lorraine바카라 사이트™s tax position reveals inaccuracies for which she has incurred a penalty. The table below shows the penalties which are relevant penalties.
Ìý | Penalty for바카라 사이트¦ | Relevant penalty? | Relates to PDDD period? |
---|---|---|---|
Year ended 5 April 2009 | Deliberate inaccuracy | Yes | No |
Year ended 5 April 2010 | Deliberate inaccuracy | Yes | No |
28 November 2010 | Deliberate failure | Yes | Yes |
Year ended 5 April 2011 | Deliberate inaccuracy | Yes | Yes |
All the penalties are relevant penalties. However, the penalties for inaccuracies for the periods ending 5 April 2009 and 5 April 2010 do not relate to PDDD periods, see CH190664, because they do not relate to an inaccuracy in a tax document for a period beginning on or after 1 April 2010. This means that the answer to question 2 is 바카라 사이트˜no바카라 사이트™ for these penalties and so we cannot publish the details of these penalties.
The relevant penalty for the deliberate failure relates to a failure that took place after 1 April 2010. So for this penalty the answer to question 2 is 바카라 사이트˜yes바카라 사이트™.
The relevant penalty for the deliberate inaccuracy in the year ended 5 April 2011 relates to an inaccuracy in a tax document for a period beginning on 6 April 2010. So for this penalty the answer to question 2 is 바카라 사이트˜yes바카라 사이트™.
In Lorraine바카라 사이트™s case, we should continue to question 3, see CH190680, for the two relevant penalties that relate to the PDDD period.