Putin바카라 사이트s sinister threats and lies extend far beyond his own country: article by Boris Johnson
Writing in the Telegraph. the Foreign Secretary looks at disruptive behaviour from the Russian State relating to the Russian election and the Salisbury attack.

To understand why 3 people lie stricken in Salisbury, look at Vladimir Putin바카라 사이트s actions inside Russia.
Yesterday he was proclaimed the winner of an election that resembled a coronation, complete with a triumphant ceremony outside the walls of the Kremlin. Mr Putin바카라 사이트s leading opponent had obviously been banned from standing and an abundance of CCTV footage appeared to show election officials nonchalantly stuffing ballot boxes.
One loyal functionary in Siberia used balloons in Russia바카라 사이트s national colours for the novel function of covering up a prying camera. 바카라 사이트A choice without a real competition, as we have seen in this election, unfortunately is not a real choice,바카라 사이트 was the verdict of the observer mission from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE).
As he extends his grip on power, Mr Putin is taking his country in a dangerous direction. Throughout his rule he has eroded the liberties of the Russian people, tightened the screws of state repression and hunted down supposed foes.
When a leader starts behaving in this way then no-one should be surprised if many of his compatriots feel drawn to the example of countries that observe a different scale of values. They will notice that plenty of nations hold elections where no-one knows the result in advance. They will see how free societies in Europe, America and elsewhere thrive and prosper precisely because people are able to live as they choose, provided they do no harm.
They will understand how an independent media exposes the failings or evasions of democratic governments. And they will wonder why Russia cannot have the same? Mr Putin cannot give the straight answer, which is that he must deny Russia those freedoms in order to guarantee his perpetual rule. Instead, he has to send an emphatic message that asking awkward questions or turning against him carries a terrible price. Which brings us back to Salisbury. The use of a Russian military grade 바카라 사이트Novichok바카라 사이트 nerve agent against Sergei Skripal and his daughter, Yulia, was very deliberate.
As Ken Clarke pointed out in Parliament last week, the obvious Russian-ness of the weapon was designed to send a signal to anyone pondering dissent amid the intensifying repression of Mr Putin바카라 사이트s Russia. The message is clear: we will hunt you down, we will find you and we will kill you 바카라 사이트 and though we will scornfully deny our guilt, the world will know that Russia did it.
There was a hint of this in Mr Putin바카라 사이트s first public response to Salisbury. He denied Russia바카라 사이트s culpability 바카라 사이트 of course 바카라 사이트 while carefully injecting a note of menace. 바카라 사이트If it was military grade agent,바카라 사이트 he said, 바카라 사이트they would have died on the spot, obviously.바카라 사이트
Obviously. After all, he had already told state television that traitors would 바카라 사이트kick the bucket바카라 사이트 and 바카라 사이트choke바카라 사이트 on their 바카라 사이트pieces of silver바카라 사이트. Yet the Kremlin, accustomed to a tame official media, is clearly struggling to get its story straight.
Since the Skripals and Detective Sergeant Nick Bailey were struck down on March 4, Russian officials and the state media have claimed variously that 바카라 사이트Novichok바카라 사이트 never existed, or the stockpiles were destroyed, or they weren바카라 사이트t destroyed but mysteriously escaped to other countries.
Alexander Shulgin, the Russian Ambassador to The Hague, told Sky News: 바카라 사이트I바카라 사이트ve never heard about this programme, about this Novichok agent. Never.바카라 사이트 But his memory suddenly improved when he appeared on Russia Today and said that Novichok had been developed by the Soviet Union. 바카라 사이트There never was such a programme under such a codename in the Russian Federation,바카라 사이트 he said. 바카라 사이트However, in Soviet times research began to produce a new generation of poisonous substances.바카라 사이트
This seemed to wrongfoot the Russian foreign ministry, whose spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, declared on the same day that neither Russia nor the Soviet Union had created Novichok. 바카라 사이트This programme is not the creation of Russia or the Soviet Union,바카라 사이트 she said, before disgracefully pointing the finger at Sweden, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, America 바카라 사이트 and inevitably the UK.
Meanwhile, other Russian officials have sought to conjure doubt and suspicion out of thin air. Alexander Yakovenko, the Russian Ambassador in London, questioned the absence of photographs of the Skripals in their hospital beds.
His counterpart in Brussels, Vladimir Chizhov, accused Britain of breaking 바카라 사이트consular conventions바카라 사이트 because Russian officials had not been able to visit the Skripals.
The response to the 2 envoys is so obvious that I can scarcely believe they require instruction. Sergei and Yulia Skripal have been in a coma since 4 March 바카라 사이트 as you would expect from victims of a nerve agent attack. They cannot give their consent to be photographed or receive visitors. Under the NHS Code of Practice, hospitals must have their patients바카라 사이트 permission before allowing this to happen.
And I will make the point as delicately as possible: it is not obvious that the Skripals, of all patients, would welcome a visit from Russian officials. The Russian state is resorting to its usual strategy of trying to conceal the needle of truth in a haystack of lies and obfuscation.
But when I met my European counterparts in Brussels yesterday, what struck me most is that no-one is fooled. Just about every country represented around the table had been affected by malign or disruptive Russian behaviour. Most had endured the kind of mendacious propaganda onslaught that the UK is experiencing today.
This is how Mr Putin behaves at home; we should not expect anything different abroad.
Find out more about the UK government response to the Salisbury attack.