Transcript - 'Ofqual Explains: Strengths of obligation'
Published 10 December 2018
Applies to England
漏 Crown copyright 2018
This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open 바카라 사이트 Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk.
Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned.
This publication is available at /government/publications/ofqual-explains-video-series-launched-on-youtube/transcript-ofqual-explains-strengths-of-obligation
Welcome to another episode of Ofqual Explains. In this episode, I바카라 사이트檓 going to talk about the different strengths of obligation contained within our rules.
In some of our other episodes, we바카라 사이트檝e explained that we set both general and specific rules (and guidance) for the qualifications we regulate. We바카라 사이트檝e also talked about the language of our rules and mentioned that we can 바카라 사이트� and do 바카라 사이트� set different strengths of obligation. And that바카라 사이트檚 what I바카라 사이트檓 going to talk more about now.
I바카라 사이트檓 going to start by talking about absolute obligations. In some ways, these are simple and easy obligations to understand; they are strict rules that awarding organisations must follow in all circumstances. Because we set outcome-based rules wherever we can, these rules will often specify outcomes an awarding organisation must deliver. One example is the requirement in General Condition A4.2 for awarding organisations to 바카라 사이트渋dentify 바카라 사이트� all conflicts of interest that relate to바카라 사이트� them.
When setting absolute obligations, we usually use words like 바카라 사이트榚nsure바카라 사이트�, 바카라 사이트榮ecure바카라 사이트�, 바카라 사이트榤ust바카라 사이트� (and, of course, 바카라 사이트榤ust not바카라 사이트�). Where it is appropriate to set absolute obligations, we do 바카라 사이트� because it바카라 사이트檚 simpler and clearer for everyone to understand a rule that always applies.
But, of course, there are a number of situations where it바카라 사이트檚 not appropriate for us to set absolute obligations. One of those situations is if awarding organisations cannot fully control whether or not a particular outcome is achieved, or where an absolute obligation could impose undue costs or burden. In these situations, we could set a qualified obligation. The precise strength of that obligation can vary, depending on what바카라 사이트檚 appropriate.
We try to use consistent language across our rules and guidance to signal the strength of obligations. If you want to understand how strong a particular obligation is, then you will need to look more closely at its precise wording.
The two most common forms of wording we use are;
- 바카라 사이트榯ake all reasonable steps바카라 사이트� to achieve an outcome. This is a high bar to meet, as it requires awarding organisations to do everything they can to deliver an outcome,
- 바카라 사이트榟ave regard to바카라 사이트� a particular approach to achieving an outcome, or to particular information when making a decision. Here, awarding organisations must consider the suggested approach or information, but can legitimately choose not to follow it where that is appropriate.
A variant of this is a requirement to 바카라 사이트榟ave due regard to바카라 사이트� a particular approach or information. This requires the awarding organisation to consider that approach or information, and give it appropriate weight when taking decisions.
The other situation is where it바카라 사이트檚 only appropriate for a rule to apply in certain circumstances 바카라 사이트� for example if an awarding organisation takes a particular approach to delivering its qualifications. When setting rules that only apply in particular circumstances, we normally use words such as 바카라 사이트榳here바카라 사이트� or 바카라 사이트榓ny바카라 사이트�. For example;
- Condition A3.1(b) states: 바카라 사이트榃here there is a change of control in relation to an awarding organisation, it must put in place a plan designed to ensure that the interests of Learners will be protected바카라 사이트�.
This is an absolute requirement, which only applies if a change of control in an awarding organisation takes place
- Condition C3.1(a) states that 바카라 사이트榃here an awarding organisation has in place an endorsement process, the awarding organisation must take all reasonable steps to ensure that the endorsement process does not have an Adverse Effect바카라 사이트�
This is a qualified requirement, which only applies if the awarding organisation has a process for endorsing resources designed to support teaching.
To recap;
- our rules contain different strengths of obligation 바카라 사이트� signalled by the different language we use when setting out those obligations,
- what you will need to do to demonstrate compliance with an obligation will depend on its strength,
- some obligations only apply in specific circumstances 바카라 사이트� again the language we use will signal this.
You can find all of our rules and guidance on our website, simply click on 바카라 사이트榰nderstand our rules바카라 사이트�.