Leeds City Council v EO (HB): [2019] UKUT 96 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Ward on 20 March 2019.

Read the full decision in

Judicial Summary

Can evidence provided in support of an application for a person to have the right to reside as a self-sufficient Chen child and for his primary carer to have a derivative right under paragraph 257C of the immigration rules (as they stood at the material time) amount to a maintenance undertaking for the purposes of s.115 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999, or an undertaking for the purposes of para 3 of the Schedule to SI2000/636 (which provides relief in limited circumstances from the exclusion effected by s.115)?

Updates to this page

Published 11 April 2019