IRD -v- His Majesty's Revenue & Customs (TC): [2025] UKUT 061 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Church on 13 February 2025
Read the full decision in .
Judicial Summary
This decision is mainly about the proper interpretation of, and proper approach to, the conditions to entitlement for working tax credit under the Tax Credits Act 2002 (the 바카라 사이트�2002 Act바카라 사이트�) and the Working Tax Credit (Entitlement and Maximum Rate) Regulations 2002 (the 바카라 사이트�2002 Regulations바카라 사이트�).
The Appellant claimed working tax credit on the basis that he was over 60 and worked over 16 hours a week in his business trading financial futures as principal. He argued he was 바카라 사이트渟elf-employed바카라 사이트� for the purposes of Regulations 2(1) and 4(1) of the 2002 Regulations and was engaged in 바카라 사이트渜ualifying remunerative work바카라 사이트� for the purposes of Section 10 of the 2002 Act.
The Upper Tribunal considers what it means for an activity to be carried out 바카라 사이트渙n a commercial basis바카라 사이트� and 바카라 사이트渨ith a view to the realisation of profits바카라 사이트�.
It decides that, while the requirement for an activity to be carried on 바카라 사이트渨ith a view to the realisation of profits바카라 사이트� does not require it to be profitable, or for there to be anything like certainty as to its future profits, there must be more than a mere intention or hope that it will become profitable. It requires a realistic expectation of profit in the foreseeable future, and a credible plan of how to achieve it.
The Upper Tribunal also explains that the Appellant바카라 사이트檚 trading of financial futures solely as principal can바카라 사이트檛 satisfy the fourth condition in regulation 4 of the 2002 Regulations because none of the payments that he receives (or may expect to receive) is payment for the work he does. Both appeals dismissed.