DGW v Disclosure and Barring Service: [2025] UKUT 069 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Citron on 25 February 2025
Read the full decision in .
Judicial Summary
Appellant included in children바카라 사이트s barred list in 2024, based on factual findings about events that occurred 23 years earlier, in 2001, between the appellant (then aged 26) and a 14 year old girl in social services residential care home 바카라 사이트 appellant had been convicted in 2002 of 바카라 사이트abducting an unmarried girl under 16바카라 사이트 바카라 사이트 permission to appeal granted on limited grounds 바카라 사이트 Upper Tribunal found no mistake of fact in Disclosure and Barring Service바카라 사이트s (DBS) findings that appellant had sexual relationship with the 14 year old girl and that he bought her alcohol and cannabis 바카라 사이트 Upper Tribunal also found no mistake in DBS바카라 사이트s finding that appellant held, at the time of its decision, a belief that children under 16 could consent to sex, and an attitude that he could do what he wanted irrespective of the safety or concern of others 바카라 사이트 DBS had not taken into account the course of the appellant바카라 사이트s life since 2001 바카라 사이트 that was not a mistake on a point of law (as DBS had no information on that at the time of its decision) 바카라 사이트 nor was it a mistake of fact, as DBS바카라 사이트s decision had been made on the basis of the appellant바카라 사이트s belief and attitude (as above), and the Upper Tribunal had found no mistake in these 바카라 사이트 nor was the decision disproportionate 바카라 사이트 appeal dismissed.