CA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and TB (CSM): [2020] UKUT 205 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision of Judge Poynter on 14 April 2020.
Read the full decision in .
Judicial Summary
바카라 사이트śRevisions, supersessions and reviews바카라 사이트”Change of circumstances바카라 사이트”identifying which change of circumstances is 바카라 사이트śmaterial바카라 사이트ť. Revisions, supersessions and reviews바카라 사이트”Date of effect of decision바카라 사이트”whether it is possible for the Secretary of State to supersede on own initiative where no notice given under regulation 24 of the Child Support (Maintenance Assessment Procedure) Regulations 1992. Revisions, supersessions and reviews바카라 사이트”Date of effect of decision바카라 사이트”inconsistency between regulations 23(6) and 24 of the Child Support (Maintenance Assessment Procedure) Regulations 1992 taken together, and regulation 23(19). Tribunal procedure and practice (including Upper tribunal)바카라 사이트”Other바카라 사이트”Judicial exercise of the discretion conferred by section 17(2) of the Child Support Act 1991 not consider any issue that is not raised by the application to supersede, or did not cause the Secretary of State to act on his own initiative. Tribunal procedure and practice (including Upper tribunal)바카라 사이트”Other바카라 사이트”Whether rule 24 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Social Entitlement Chamber) Rules 2008 requires that, in change of circumstances cases, the Secretary of State바카라 사이트™s response should include the calculations for the superseded decision as well as the superseding decision.바카라 사이트ť