Research and analysis

Summary of published RPC opinions and statements

The attached spreadsheets contain the ratings in published RPC opinions since 2020 and a summary of the cases where we have published a statement of lateness

• From: Regulatory Policy Committee
• Published: 24 May 2024
• Last updated: 24 February 2025 바카라 사이트� See all updates

Documents

MS Excel Spreadsheet, 86.9 KB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@bis.gsi.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

MS Excel Spreadsheet, 31.6 KB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@bis.gsi.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

MS Excel Spreadsheet, 21.8 KB

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email enquiries@bis.gsi.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

The Regulatory Policy Committee assesses the quality of 바카라 사이트 Impact Assessments (IAs) and Post Implementation Reviews (PIRs). We publish our opinions on IAs/PIRs when the IA/PIR is published.

Since late 2020 (when we started using a new format), RPC opinions have offered views on the overall fitness-for-purpose of the IA, whether the Department바카라 사이트檚 estimate of the direct costs of the measure and the assessment of the impacts on small and micro businesses are fit for purpose or not; and ratings for the quality of the assessment of: 바카라 사이트榬ationale and objectives바카라 사이트�, 바카라 사이트榗ost-benefit analysis바카라 사이트�, 바카라 사이트榳ider impacts바카라 사이트�, and 바카라 사이트榤onitoring and evaluation바카라 사이트� (these are rated either 바카라 사이트榞ood바카라 사이트�, 바카라 사이트榮atisfactory바카라 사이트�, 바카라 사이트榳eak바카라 사이트� or 바카라 사이트榲ery weak바카라 사이트�).

Similarly, PRC opinions on PIRs comment on the overall fitness for purpose as well as quality ratings for 바카라 사이트榤onitoring바카라 사이트� and for 바카라 사이트榚valuation바카라 사이트� (using the same rating scheme).

While these ratings and quality assessments are already in the public domain, they sit in individual RPC opinions, and it is therefore difficult to see trends in the data and to compare the performance of different departments. We have therefore decided to make available the attached spreadsheets that summarise the key information across all of our published IA and PIR opinions since we started using the current format.

We have added (February 2025) a spreadsheet summarising the cases where we have had to issue a statement of lateness. More information on these and links to all such statements can be found here.

We will update these spreadsheets periodically.

Published 24 May 2024

Last updated 24 February 2025 + show all updates

1. 24 February 2025

   We have added a spreadsheet attachment summarising RPC statements of lateness to date.

2. 6 August 2024

   x

3. 24 May 2024

   First published.