Research and analysis

바카라 사이트‹바카라 사이트‹Responding to Criticisms of the CASLO Approach (Report A)바카라 사이트‹

A taxonomy of potential problems - part of a series from Ofqual바카라 사이트™s programme of research into the CASLO approach.

• From: Ofqual
• Published: 18 November 2024

Applies to England

Documents

Responding to Criticisms of the CASLO Approach (Report A)

Ref: Ofqual/24/7177

HTML

Ref: Ofqual/24/7177

PDF, 497 KB, 38 pages

This file may not be suitable for users of assistive technology.

Request an accessible format.

If you use assistive technology (such as a screen reader) and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications@ofqual.gov.uk. Please tell us what format you need. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use.

Details

Over the past few years, Ofqual has invested in a programme of research into what we now refer to as the 바카라 사이트˜CASLO바카라 사이트™ approach to qualification design.

Engaging with the literature has been an important part of our research into the CASLO approach, although it proved to be a challenging literature to engage with. This report outlines criticisms from the core literature.

Authors

Paul E. Newton, Milja Curcin, Latoya Clarke and Astera Brylka and from Ofqual바카라 사이트™s Standards, Research and Analysis Directorate.

With thanks to

With thanks to Chris Winch for his expert advice on the literature.

The CASLO Research Programme

This report is part of a series that arose from Ofqual바카라 사이트™s 2020 to 2024 programme of research into the CASLO approach:

1. The CASLO Research Programme: Overview of research projects conducted between 2020 and 2024.

2. The CASLO Approach: A design template for vocational and technical qualifications.

3. How 바카라 사이트˜CASLO바카라 사이트™ Qualifications Work. (This was published in February 2022.)

4. Origins and Evolution of the CASLO Approach in England: The importance of outcomes and mastery when designing vocational and technical qualifications.

5. Responding to Criticisms of the CASLO Approach (Report A): A taxonomy of potential problems.

6. Responding to Criticisms of the CASLO Approach (Report B): Views from awarding organisations.

7. Responding to Criticisms of the CASLO Approach (Report C): Views from qualification stakeholders.

8. Responding to Criticisms of the CASLO Approach (Report D): Properties of qualifications from the CASLO research programme.

9. Understanding Qualification Design: Insights from the 2020 to 2024 CASLO qualification research programme.

Published 18 November 2024