Research and analysis

Findings from the children and young people strand of the Big Listen

Published 3 September 2024

Applies to England

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank everyone who responded to the Big Listen online consultation aimed at children. We are also grateful for the support from our research partners Coram Voice, Career Matters and Catch 22, who organised focus group discussions for us, and the children in care and care leavers who participated in these. Your views on what is important will help us improve and shape Ofsted바카라 사이트s future direction.

Context

Ofsted is the Office for Standards in Education, Children바카라 사이트s Services and Skills. We inspect services that provide education and skills for learners of all ages in England. We also inspect and regulate services that care for children and learners.

In January 2024, His Majesty바카라 사이트s Chief Inspector, announced his intention to carry out the Big Listen, a comprehensive consultation that asked for people바카라 사이트s views on how to improve our approach to inspection and regulation. The Big Listen was launched in early March. It gave professionals, children and learners, parents, carers, and the public an opportunity to give their feedback on our work.

In September 2024, we published our response to the Big Listen, setting out the actions we will take to address what we heard.

This report sets out the findings from our Big Listen public consultation.

Executive summary

This strand reports the findings from our consultation survey responses and focus-group discussions with children and young people. The purpose of this strand was to hear what children and young people think about the 4 overarching areas of the Big Listen:

  1. Inspection practice: what we should look at and ask about during inspections
  2. Culture: the conduct of Ofsted바카라 사이트s education and social care inspectors and how they should talk to children
  3. Reporting: how Ofsted reports on education and social care inspections
  4. Impact: the impact of Ofsted바카라 사이트s education and social care inspections on children, leaders, providers, professionals, and parents and carers

The findings showed that, during inspection, children want us to ask whether they are happy and whether they feel safe. These were the 2 most important things for both school and social care inspections.

When we visit schools, children want inspectors to ask what the environment is like in their school and whether the school meets their needs, emotionally and academically. They want inspectors to know whether they are thriving at school and what this looks like. Children in care want inspectors to ask about the support they get from their school and how well the school understands their experiences and needs as a child in care.  

Children told us they want inspectors to ask about their relationships with teachers and how their school manages behaviour, particularly bullying. Children also said that inspectors should speak to a wide range of pupils and not just those that the school chooses.

Children want us to ask their opinions on the things that matter to them at school, as well as where they live if they are in the care of the local authority (LA). To do this openly and honestly, children need to feel comfortable talking to inspectors. At present, this is not always the case. Children say they may have to meet inspectors in an unfamiliar room. They may also have to talk in a group of children they might not get on with or know very well.

Children also emphasised the importance of social care inspectors building trust with them and making sure they could speak confidentially, away from adults.

It is important that children do not feel like they are being interrogated when they meet with inspectors, either at school or in their home.

Methodology

Our consultation with children collected evidence from an online survey, open to all children, and focus-group discussions with children in care and care leavers.

The survey questionnaire was available online between 21 March and 31 May 2024. Any child (aged under 18) could complete it, or an adult on their behalf. The survey asked children what they thought were the most important things Ofsted should ask about during inspections and how inspectors should gather information. It included questions for all children to answer, followed by a section about social care inspections for children who said they were having support from a social worker.

We received 4,325 completed questionnaires. The majority of respondents (77%) were secondary school pupils aged 11 to 18; 17% were under 11.[footnote 1] Six per cent of questionnaires were completed by an adult on behalf of a child. We also had a high number of responses from children with experience of social services. Thirteen per cent of all respondents (514 children) reported that they had received support from a social worker.

We commissioned external organisations to carry out focus-group discussions with children in care and care leavers up to the age of 26. These were about their views on school and social care inspections. We worked with 3 organisations:

  • Coram Voice
  • Career Matters
  • Catch 22

In these focus groups, we heard from 37 primary- and secondary-aged children in care. We also spoke to 22 care leavers, including a group of 10 in a young offender institution (YOI).[footnote 2]

How to read this report

The views expressed in this report are those of the children and young people who responded to the public consultation or joined the focus groups (or the adults who responded to the consultation on behalf of their children).

The language used, especially the quotes, reflect the choice of words and unfiltered views from them.

In some cases, responses and quotes reflected a lack of knowledge about Ofsted바카라 사이트s policies and practices, and we have included these in the report without any caveats or corrections.

In this report, we have not commented on or responded to any of the views shared. We have done that in our Big Listen response.

Survey results

Children were remarkably consistent in what they said inspectors should look at during school inspections, whatever their age. The top 3 things children want inspectors to ask about are:[footnote 3]

1) How happy pupils are at your school

2) How your school keeps you safe and well

3) How well teachers teach at your school

The least important things for children were: how well pupils do in tests and exams; extra-curricular activities and clubs outside lessons, and support with attendance.

Figure 1: What are the most important things you think Ofsted inspectors should look at when they inspect your school? (By age of respondents)

View the data in an accessible format.

Children were of the same view in regard to children바카라 사이트s homes, residential special schools and fostering services. They most commonly selected happiness and safety as areas they wanted inspectors to focus on.

Figure 2: What are the most important things you think Ofsted inspectors should look at when they visit children바카라 사이트s homes and residential special schools or inspect fostering services? (By age of respondents)

View the data in an accessible format.

We also asked whether children would want to read an inspection report. Nearly half (47%) of all children who responded said they would. A quarter (25%) did not know whether they would.

What children told us about school inspections

Inspection practice: what children want inspectors to ask about

We asked children to give detail in a free-text response about what they thought inspectors should ask about when they visit schools.[footnote 4]

The majority of children who responded reiterated that inspectors should ask about their happiness, well-being and safety, and whether they felt schools were supportive in ensuring this.

Most important was whether school is a happy place. Children want to talk to inspectors about how happy they are, whether they like coming to school and what they like about it. As one child said during a focus group: 바카라 사이트I바카라 사이트d want to see that the school has been good for that child and to see them thrive.바카라 사이트

Children also want inspectors to ask them about their mental health and how well schools identify and support mental-health struggles. This was more important for children over the age of 11 compared with younger children.

Children also said that inspectors should ask about the support they get in school. Around 15% of children who answered this question referred specifically to inspectors asking how schools meet the needs of distinct groups of pupils, such as young carers, children in care and those with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND). Children want inspectors to ask not just how well schools support pupils with SEND, but how well they understand how children바카라 사이트s experiences and lives outside of school affect their learning in school. However, children with different needs and circumstances were clear that they did not want to feel 바카라 사이트singled out바카라 사이트 or 바카라 사이트segregated바카라 사이트 in how they are included in inspections or inspection reports.

Children in care said that, during school inspections, they want inspectors to ask about the support they get from school as a child in care and whether staff understand what it is like to be in care. This includes the challenges in their home life and how this may affect their behaviour at school. Many suggested that teachers should 바카라 사이트have an understanding of the young person바카라 사이트s home life바카라 사이트 how they have been supported바카라 사이트. One or 2 children talked about the positive impact of teachers who checked in on them or supported them when they were having difficulties in their home life.

The group of young people in a YOI said inspectors should ask what schools do to help prevent looked-after children becoming involved in the criminal justice system. They all agreed that career guidance would have helped them to plan for further education, employment or training. They also said inspectors should ask what schools do to keep them in mainstream school rather than excluding them and/or sending them to a pupil referral unit (PRU).[footnote 5] Everyone in this group had attended a PRU. They felt schools could have done more to prevent this.

바카라 사이트Ofsted should inspect standards of education, regulate punishment and PRU referrals [and] inspect the available support.바카라 사이트

Children바카라 사이트s experience of school is closely linked to their relationships with teachers. The children we heard from talked about inspectors asking whether they feel they are treated 바카라 사이트kindly and fairly바카라 사이트 and whether there is a mutual respect between teachers and pupils. They said that inspectors should ask how pupils feel teachers treat them. This included how kind teachers are.

Children told us inspectors should ask about teaching. This included asking about how well teachers teach, the subjects on offer for GCSE, the progress children make and the number of supply teachers. One or 2 children said it was important to ask how happy teachers are.

Children want to talk to inspectors about behaviour in schools. They said inspectors should ask how schools manage poor behaviour and how they respond to the behaviour of children with SEND. The issue mentioned most often was how schools deal with bullying.

Children also want inspectors to ask about the physical environment at school. A small proportion of children referred directly to how clean schools are, specifically the toilets. Lunches are also important. Other than toilets, lunch was the only specific thing children said they want inspectors to ask about.

Inspection culture: how inspectors should talk to children

The questionnaire included a free-text response asking how inspectors should find out what children think when they inspect schools.[footnote 6]

Children who filled in the free-text response unanimously said that inspectors should get children바카라 사이트s views directly from them. Of those who answered on this, most suggested using a survey rather than speaking to children in a group or individually. School inspections do include a survey for pupils. However, children바카라 사이트s responses here suggest that they do not know this and/or they have not been asked to fill it in as part of an inspection. Children who said they would prefer to talk individually stressed the importance of confidentiality and being able to talk freely and honestly.

They also told us that speaking to inspectors in front of a group of children they may not know can make it harder to say what they feel. One or 2 suggested talking to children through email or phone/text:

바카라 사이트Phone calls or texting a lot of people would [be] better considering a lot of people are anxious when speaking to new people and will likely say nice things rather than the truth sometimes.바카라 사이트

They also want to feel comfortable talking to inspectors, given that they are strangers. Children suggested that inspectors need to think more about what will make children feel comfortable and create a more informal environment wherever they can.

바카라 사이트Don바카라 사이트t take us into a small room we don바카라 사이트t normally go into. When we spoke to the inspector, I went in a room with children I didn바카라 사이트t know well and the room was claustrophobic, I didn바카라 사이트t know what to say.바카라 사이트

Children also want opportunities to speak to inspectors in less formal situations. For example, they could meet during breaktime or lunchtime without the presence of adults. These are more likely to be 바카라 사이트safe spaces바카라 사이트 as they are less controlled by adults. Children can then choose who to speak to, as well as how and when to talk to them.

Children said they want to feel that they can trust inspectors. It is important for inspectors to build trust quickly within the short timeframe of a 1- or 2-day inspection so that children feel safe talking honestly. This will help children give inspectors a true picture of what being a pupil in their school is like day to day.

Children want inspectors to ask their opinions about the things at school that are important to them as pupils and not make the meeting feel like an interview. For example, they should ask what it is like to be a pupil at their school and what children think could be improved or changed for the better.

바카라 사이트Ensure conversations are less of a guessing game/interrogation with vague questions trying to reinforce an agenda. Instead, declare what you바카라 사이트re trying to find out. So, instead of asking 바카라 사이트do you get bullied?바카라 사이트, say[ing] 바카라 사이트We think bullying may be a problem; what do you think?바카라 사이트 will make young people feel more involved and less like a guinea pig.바카라 사이트

Children had several other suggestions for ways that inspectors could talk to them and find out what they think. Children of all ages wanted inspectors to use drawings and more interactive methods of gathering their opinions. They talked about using non-verbal forms of communication such as Makaton and Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS), drawing pictures and using interactive methods to find out what they think.[footnote 7] A few children suggested that it would be good if they had more time to respond to questions, such as by having the questions in advance.

Children suggested that inspectors should have drop-in sessions so that children could decide whether they want to talk to inspectors. Children said they were unsure whether they could refuse to talk to inspectors if they were asked by the school.

Children said that teachers can behave differently during an inspection. Some mentioned pupils being coached and pupils who were not in class or absent from school. Care-experienced young people in the YOI told us: 

바카라 사이트You were not allowed in school if you were in trouble when inspection was taking place.바카라 사이트

바카라 사이트If you are a bad student, you are asked to take the day off when inspectors are coming.바카라 사이트

One aspect of inspection that many children mentioned was how schools decided which children inspectors should speak to. Children said they felt that schools select pupils who will give the 바카라 사이트right answers바카라 사이트. They told us that inspectors need to talk to a wide range of children to capture as many different experiences and views as possible, not just those of the children chosen by school.

바카라 사이트Ask random children not just children the school pick because they always make sure people say good things. And ask them what makes school more difficult for them.바카라 사이트

Children wanted inspectors to talk to children in detention, children with different behaviour reports and test scores, as well as children attending different clubs and extra-curricular activities.

바카라 사이트Inspectors should talk to a larger array of students, particularly those who fall on the extreme ends of the scale for behaviour, attendance and performance (positive and negative). They should also talk to anyone who has, at any point, attended any out-of-mainstream education provision.바카라 사이트

What children told us about social care inspections

Inspection practice: what children want inspectors to ask about

During our focus-group discussions with looked-after children and care leavers, we asked about social care inspections. We wanted to know what they thought were the most important things for inspectors to ask about when they visited children바카라 사이트s homes or inspected their foster carer바카라 사이트s agency.

What they told us was broadly similar to what children who responded to the survey told us they want inspectors to focus on during school inspections. They want inspectors to ask whether they are happy, and whether they feel safe. The main difference was the emphasis children put on social care inspectors building trust with them and making sure they could speak confidentially, away from adults.

Just as children said we should ask about their relationships with teachers, care-experienced young people said inspectors should ask about the relationships they have with their foster families and social care professionals, as well as school staff. They specifically mentioned inspectors asking about the relationship with their social worker. They want inspectors to understand how this affects them and the negative impact this relationship can have on their care and well-being:

바카라 사이트Not having that support, you know, having a social worker that바카라 사이트s constantly changing and switching, you바카라 사이트re never going to build a bond. I always thought there was some form of barrier, you know, because there바카라 사이트s never that opportunity. If you바카라 사이트re constantly getting a new one and it바카라 사이트s just, you know바카라 사이트 it바카라 사이트s not good for the child.바카라 사이트

Many care leavers said they had received limited support from care professionals, who they felt were not doing what was expected of them. They said that inspectors should not just ask about the support they get from different professionals. They should ask whether children know what professionals바카라 사이트 responsibilities are and what support and advice children can expect from them.

We also spoke to the care leavers in the YOI about the support they had received from social care professionals. They talked about having a non-existent relationship with social workers, to the point of not knowing how social workers were meant to help them. Several had had very little contact with their LA or social worker since going into the YOI. They knew very little about the support they were entitled to.[footnote 8] They said Ofsted should ask about the help they get from carers to keep them in school and prevent them from being excluded.  

바카라 사이트In a care home, there is less care. When they care less, you care less. The feeling of being cared for [and] relationship with the carer is important.바카라 사이트

Inspection culture: how inspectors should talk to children

We also asked how inspectors should find out what children think. Children with a social worker who responded to the survey thought inspectors should observe them in a familiar environment or talk to them in an informal situation, such as while they were having tea. A few children mentioned the importance of biscuits and fidget toys as ways to create a less formal environment.

Children in the focus groups also said that inspectors should get to know them and understand how their experiences might have an impact on their happiness and well-being. They said they want inspectors to show that they value what they have to say about home and school life, and understand the issues that affect them.

바카라 사이트That schools and Ofsted really understand trauma and attachment. I missed lots of school before I was adopted but I didn바카라 사이트t get any extra support when I started school. I바카라 사이트m always playing catch up. Some teachers just don바카라 사이트t get it that I바카라 사이트m constantly in freeze or flight and I바카라 사이트m overwhelmed in school.바카라 사이트

A few said that inspectors should be aware of their body language and how some questions might make them feel uncomfortable. They said inspectors should have training to understand the experiences of looked-after children and trauma-informed approaches to care. This would help inspectors establish a trusting relationship because children would feel that they understood their educational and emotional needs.

Children described their experience of inspectors visiting their home during a social care inspection. They emphasised how important it was that inspectors created an informal environment. One child said during a focus group:

바카라 사이트Remember, you바카라 사이트re coming in the young people바카라 사이트s home and not your work바카라 사이트 They바카라 사이트re stepping in our homes, so they should be making us feel at ease.바카라 사이트

Children also talked about the way inspectors dress and how formal it can feel when they are coming into where children live:

바카라 사이트It바카라 사이트s not like they바카라 사이트re going into just a school or something like that. They are coming into our homes. I do think, yeah, keeping a level [of] professionalism about them is good. But if they바카라 사이트re speaking to like a young person바카라 사이트 a young person might feel more comfortable if they 바카라 사이트 [are in] more human clothes.바카라 사이트

Children who had been part of social care inspections gave examples of how staff had made the experience less formal for them. One care leaver said that LA staff:

바카라 사이트바카라 사이트set up kind of like a few snacks and stuff because food and bribery [work] very, very well for children. Got a few games set up and stuff and we kinda just got the Ofsted workers to talk to them like that.바카라 사이트

Another compared their experience of inspectors visiting a children바카라 사이트s home to a school inspection, and what made the process more informal and comfortable:

바카라 사이트It was much less formal and it was just more like I could kind of relax and they were on the bean bags and, like, they were on the couch and just it was like a general chat. It didn바카라 사이트t feel like I was getting, like, judged or scrutinised or anything.바카라 사이트

However, this was not the case for other children. Some talked about the overly formal nature of meetings with inspectors and the presence of LA workers, which 바카라 사이트strangulated바카라 사이트 honest conversation. One care leaver who took part in an inspection of local authority children바카라 사이트s services (ILACS) described a group discussion with the inspector where the Deputy Director of Children바카라 사이트s Services was in the room. This made them feel intimidated and unable to share the negative experiences they had of LA services.

Reporting: telling children what we find out

As well as gathering children바카라 사이트s views about inspection practice and culture through the survey, we asked children in focus groups how they wanted to know what we found out during inspection.

Children said they wanted to read inspection reports and learn about suggested improvements. Many felt it was important for young people to know the feedback given by Ofsted after an inspection. As one care leaver said: 바카라 사이트If you are involved in something as important as this, you are gonna wanna have some sort of outcome.바카라 사이트

They also wanted reports to be more accessible for children. Inspectors do write child-friendly inspection reports for standard and short ILACS and children바카라 사이트s home inspections. These are sent to the LA or direct to the children바카라 사이트s home. The children we spoke to did not always see, or know about, these. We do not publish them online as they are personalised. It is up to the LA or children바카라 사이트s home to decide how best to share the summary with children in care.

Children suggested that Ofsted should publish a shorter, summarised version of ILACS and school inspection reports, with children as the target audience. Many stressed the importance of simple, child-friendly language. They also suggested different formats to make reports more accessible, such as videos or visuals to better illustrate findings. Some suggested receiving emails with the outcomes of inspections.

Children also explained why it was important for them know about the outcome of school inspections:

바카라 사이트I feel like young people want to improve the school as well because they바카라 사이트re obviously going there. So, I feel like that바카라 사이트 if they were told a bit more, bit like what바카라 사이트 teachers were told.바카라 사이트

바카라 사이트I feel like young people should be involved a lot more with the feedback바카라 사이트 if they don바카라 사이트t know about it, then they can바카라 사이트t really help or anything.바카라 사이트

Care-experienced children and young people said there were advantages and disadvantages to having a section in school inspection reports devoted to looked-after children. They said inspectors should talk to looked-after children to understand their needs and how schools support them. This will help hold schools to account for the support they give. It would also draw the school leadership바카라 사이트s attention to the experiences of looked-after children specifically, rather than as part of vulnerable children as a wider group.

바카라 사이트It바카라 사이트s sort of like you바카라 사이트re not identified as a group, so 바카라 사이트 maybe they can sort of wiggle [their] way out of actually like having a look at support for care leavers or sort of care-experienced support바카라 사이트. 

However, they felt it could single out children in care and stigmatise them if this was not done carefully.

바카라 사이트바카라 사이트Getting that like sort of voice heard, but not writing about them separately, because that바카라 사이트s just gonna cause further like kind of distance바카라 사이트

바카라 사이트I think it바카라 사이트s important for inspectors to know what it바카라 사이트s like in school for care-experienced young people but I don바카라 사이트t think that the inspectors should write about care leavers separately due to bullying바카라 사이트.

Impact: what children say about the role of inspection

Those in focus groups described inspections as 바카라 사이트important바카라 사이트 because they check that schools and LAs are providing good care. One said that inspection 바카라 사이트encourages growth and development and makes schools better바카라 사이트. Another care leaver said: 바카라 사이트I think everyone needs an Ofsted inspection to make sure provision standards are maintained in the face of challenges바카라 사이트.

However, some children and young people were sceptical about the impact of inspections as they felt findings were 바카라 사이트fake바카라 사이트 and 바카라 사이트untrusted바카라 사이트. This was mainly spoken about in reference to school and LA staff 바카라 사이트scrambling바카라 사이트 to present the best picture of their provision.

바카라 사이트Either Ofsted isn바카라 사이트t doing what they바카라 사이트re supposed to, or they don바카라 사이트t get truth and correct data from providers.바카라 사이트

바카라 사이트I think in secure units and also children바카라 사이트s homes in general, you do notice that they do kind of scramble to try and make the place not look like a dungeon.바카라 사이트

바카라 사이트When Ofsted was there, we got a bowling trip and we got taken out of the house and it was almost like they didn바카라 사이트t want Ofsted to speak to us because they knew they were going to get shut down if Ofsted did.바카라 사이트

Children did not always believe that inspections captured the reality of being a child in their school or LA.

바카라 사이트If Ofsted made a difference, why would I still experience the issues that I바카라 사이트m having at school at present?바카라 사이트

바카라 사이트They don바카라 사이트t actually spend enough time in school; they need to dig deeper.바카라 사이트

바카라 사이트Their findings don바카라 사이트t match what we think about our school.바카라 사이트

Children in focus groups also criticised the 바카라 사이트strict바카라 사이트 and 바카라 사이트harsh바카라 사이트 Ofsted judgement system. Some said that single-word judgements could unfairly label schools and damage communities. One secondary-aged pupil explained that an inadequate judgement could lead to bad behaviour and disengagement among pupils. Another said the single-word judgements were:

바카라 사이트바카라 사이트not just about the school, it바카라 사이트s about the community as well. Because then if that school in that community, it바카라 사이트s got a bad reputation just for the school, no one바카라 사이트s going to want to visit and no one바카라 사이트s gonna want to move there.바카라 사이트

Conclusion

There is a clear message from the children and young people who took part in this consultation. They want inspections to focus on their well-being and what schools and social care services do to make sure that they are happy and feel safe.

They also want to give inspectors a true picture of what it is like to be child in their school or home. For this to happen, inspectors need to create an informal environment where children are comfortable to talk openly and honestly.

Children want to talk to inspectors about their relationships with the adults in their lives and how they support them, whatever their needs or circumstances. This includes the academic and emotional support schools give and/or the relationships with carers and social care professionals.

Children have told us what matters most to them at school and where they live. This includes the things that make them feel happy and safe, as well as the support they get from teachers, carers and social care professionals to make sure this is the case. Children have also told us how we should do this. What we need to do now is show we are listening and make sure we are doing these things. We also need to find appropriate ways to tell children what we are doing and explain why.

Appendix A: breakdown of questionnaire respondent ages

Ages of pupils represented in the survey % responding
Under 11 years 17  
11바카라 사이트13 years 27  
14바카라 사이트15 years 17  
16바카라 사이트18 years 34  
Age unknown 6  

Note: numbers may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Ages of respondents completing the questionnaire % responding
Under 11 years 15
11바카라 사이트13 years 27
14바카라 사이트15 years 17
16바카라 사이트18 years 35
Adults answering on behalf of a school-age child 6

Note: numbers may not add up to 100 due to rounding.

Appendix B: breakdown of focus-group participants

Age of participants

11바카라 사이트12 years 13바카라 사이트바카라 사이트14 years 15바카라 사이트바카라 사이트17 years 18바카라 사이트26 years
7 10 20 22

Children or young people identifying as: 

Male Female Other/Undisclosed
37 21 1

Ethnicity 

Asian Black Mixed White Other
1 11 4 42 1

Length of time in care

Less than one year 1바카라 사이트2 years 3 or more years Not disclosed/don바카라 사이트t know
0 1 20 38

Participants with a long-term disability or health problem that limits day-to-day activities (long term being more than 12 months)바카라 사이트 

Yes No Not disclosed/don바카라 사이트t know
10 39 10

Appendix C: data tables for figures

Data for figure 1:What are the most important things you think Ofsted inspectors should look at when they inspect your school? (age of respondents in years)

Answer choice All Under 11s 11 or over
How happy pupils are at your school 53% 54% 53%
How your school keeps you safe and well 50% 57% 49%
How well teachers teach at your school 48% 39% 50%
How pupils behave at your school 37% 40% 36%
How well pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are supported at your school 32% 32% 32%
What you learn at your school 19% 24% 18%
How well the pupils at your school do in tests and exams (for example, SATs, GCSEs) 15% 7% 17%
What you can do outside of lessons at your school (for example, after-school clubs, sport, school trips) 10% 13% 9%
How well your school makes sure pupils come to school every day 7% 5% 7%
I don바카라 사이트t know 4% 4% 4%

See Figure 1

Data for figure 2: What are the most important things you think Ofsted inspectors should look at when we visit children바카라 사이트s homes or residential special schools or inspect fostering services? (age of respondents in years)

Answer choice All Under 11s 11 or over
How safe I feel 69% 79% 67%
How happy I am 64% 64% 64%
How I am being supported in my education 47% 52% 46%
How I am involved in decisions about things that affect me 42% 31% 44%
What it is like to live here 26% 23% 27%
How I am being supported to find a job 15% 5% 17%
I don바카라 사이트t know 8% 7% 10%

See Figure 2

  1. See appendix A for full breakdown of questionnaire respondents바카라 사이트 ages. 

  2. See appendix B for full breakdown of focus-group participants. 

  3. Children were asked to choose 3 answers from 10 options followed by a free-text response option. 

  4. We received 525 text responses to this question about school inspection, and fewer than 20 from children who reported having a social worker. 

  5. Pupil referral units (PRUs) teach children who are not able to attend mainstream school and may not otherwise receive suitable education. This could be because they have a short- or long-term illness, have been excluded or are a new starter waiting for a mainstream school place. There is a full definition of a PRU in the . 

  6. Nearly all children who completed the questionnaire (95%) answered this question. This included 84% of those who have a social worker. 

  7. Makaton uses symbols, signs and speech to enable people to communicate; PECS is a way for people to communicate without relying on speech. PECS involves using cards with pictures, symbols, words or photographs. 

  8. Local authorities have to provide information about the services and support available to care leavers, including their statutory entitlements and additional support from the LA