TM v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): [2019] UKUT 204 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Poynter on 25 June 2019.
Read the full decision in
Judicial Summary
Tribunal procedure and practice (including Upper Tribunal)바카라 사이트”Fair hearing바카라 사이트”Equality of arms바카라 사이트”Claimant바카라 사이트™s entitlement to know the case he has to meet바카라 사이트”Discussion of Tribunal바카라 사이트™s duty to correct unfairness caused by inadequacy of Secretary of State바카라 사이트™s response.
Personal independence payment바카라 사이트”General바카라 사이트”Secretary of State바카라 사이트™s response referring to draft legislation in different terms from the legislation as made바카라 사이트”Secretary of State바카라 사이트™s response referring to all regulations governing social security, rather than the specific regulations governing entitlement to personal independence payment바카라 사이트”Secretary of State바카라 사이트™s response failing to refer to relevant Acts of Parliament.