Steven Edward Burton v Information Commissioner: [2024] UKUT 134 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Citron on 3 May 2024.
Read the full decision in .
Judicial Summary
Freedom of Information Act 2000 - section 14 - appellant바카라 사이트檚 information request found to be 바카라 사이트渧exatious바카라 사이트� in Information Commissioner바카라 사이트檚 decision notice - First-tier Tribunal (FTT) struck out appellant바카라 사이트檚 appeal on basis of no reasonable prospects of success - reason given by FTT was that appellant바카라 사이트檚 appeal grounds did not engage FTT바카라 사이트檚 jurisdiction per section 58(1) - Held: FTT had not done justice to appellant바카라 사이트檚 appeal grounds - in alleging that costs were a 바카라 사이트渄rop in the ocean바카라 사이트� for public authority, the grounds did allege that the Information Commissioner바카라 사이트檚 information notice바카라 사이트檚 s14 holistic determination was 바카라 사이트渨rong바카라 사이트� per section 58(1) in finding cost burden 바카라 사이트済rossly oppressive바카라 사이트� - error of law for FTT to have considered that appellant바카라 사이트檚 grounds of appeal did not challenge decision notice바카라 사이트檚 s14 analysis - FTT decision set aside - decision remade, refusing strike-out, as appellant바카라 사이트檚 바카라 사이트渄rop in the ocean바카라 사이트� argument (as articulated in legal terms, as was proper for an 바카라 사이트渆nabling바카라 사이트� tribunal) had realistic, rather than fanciful, prospect of success.