IB v Gravesham Borough Council and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions: [2023] UKUT 193 (AAC)

Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Poynter on 7 August 2023.

Read the full decision in .

Judicial Summary

Earnings and other income바카라 사이트”Notional income바카라 사이트”Construction of the phrase 바카라 사이트śreasonable steps바카라 사이트ť in regulation 64(3) of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006바카라 사이트”Whether limited to the 바카라 사이트śmechanical steps바카라 사이트ť required to apply for a student loan or includes consideration of the personal circumstances of the individual claimant바카라 사이트”CH/4429/2006 not followed.

Housing benefit바카라 사이트”Other바카라 사이트” Construction of the phrase 바카라 사이트śreasonable steps바카라 사이트ť in regulation 64(3) of the Housing Benefit Regulations 2006바카라 사이트”Whether limited to the 바카라 사이트śmechanical steps바카라 사이트ť required to apply for a student loan or includes consideration of the personal circumstances of the individual claimant바카라 사이트”CH/4429/2006 not followed.

Human rights law바카라 사이트”Article 14 (non-discrimination)바카라 사이트”Justification.

Updates to this page

Published 5 September 2023