AW v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (PIP): 2022 UKUT 316 (AAC)
Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber decision by Judge Church on 24 November 2022.
Read the full decision in .
Judicial Summary
PIP 바카라 사이트� Claimant바카라 사이트檚 completion of the tick boxes in PIP2 questionnaire cannot be used as proxy for application of Regulation 7 of the PIP Regulations: 바카라 사이트渟ometimes바카라 사이트� could mean many things to a claimant. It may mean 바카라 사이트渙ccasionally바카라 사이트�, or it may mean 바카라 사이트渕ost, but not all of the time바카라 사이트�, or it may very well mean something in between. It is highly unlikely that a claimant, especially one who completes the questionnaire without assistance from a welfare rights adviser, will have in mind the requirements of regulation 7 of the Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013. The tick boxes do not provide the First-tier Tribunal with a short cut obviating the need to make findings as to the frequency of a claimant바카라 사이트檚 difficulties.